students. Also it is hoped that researchers conduct further research to explore the impact of
introducing critical reading skills with different sexes, ages, and fields of study at different stages
in a Saudi context. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how critical reading skills can
enhance students reading comprehension while working in groups. Three research methods were
used to collect data. An open-ended questionnaire was distributed to students to determine their
views about their role in the classroom, students’ learning logs as a way to help students to
stimulate their reflections and to increase their cognitive control over their learning and
participant, and observations carried out by the researcher to gain insight into what was taking
place while students were working on assigned tasks. The study raises three questions. They are:
1) What are the students’ views about reading comprehension and critical reading skills? And2)
What difficulties do students encounter when they read? And3) How can critical reading
strategies improve students’ reading comprehension?
Literature Review
Critical Thinking
Improving the critical thinking ability of students has become more than just a fad, it has
become central to their learning. Edman (2008) pinpointed that although faculty members see the
need for teaching critical thinking to their students in different institutions and see it as an
important educational goal, they do not state exactly what they mean by “critical thinking.”
Students must be able to think critically inside the classroom for academic purposes and outside
the classroom as well. Students are exposed to a vast volume of authentic materials, most
noticeably, while surfing the net. Students also need critical thinking to deal with the challenges
they encounter in their workplace after graduation or in their daily lives. Another benefit of
introducing critical thinking is that it can enable students to deal with the technological world
and keep up with emerging trends in technology (Edman, 2008; Ennis, 2018; Hervás & Miralles,
2006; Huijie, 2010; Wade, 2008).
Several definitions have been provided by various authors to define critical thinking. For
example, Facione (2011) defined critical thinking as “purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which
results in interpretation, evaluation, and inference as well as explanation of the evidential,
conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which judgment is
based” (p. 826). A similar definition is suggested by Astleitner (2002), who viewed critical
thinking as a higher-order thinking skill which includes evaluating arguments, and is a
purposeful, self-regulatory judgment that ends in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and
inference. It is clear from the two definitions that critical thinking requires many things to be
achieved. This is shown by Halonen & Gray (2000), who maintain that critical thinking is not
one activity; rather, the term refers to a collection of thinking skills that advance intellectual
focus, motivation, and engagement with new ideas. These thinking skills include the ability to
recognize patterns; to solve problems in practical, creative, or scientific ways; to engage in
psychological reasoning; and to adopt different perspectives when evaluating ideas or issues.
Teaching students to think critically inside or outside the classroom improves their abilities to
observe, infer, question, decide, develop new ideas, and analyze arguments. However, students
have to be involved in different activities to hone their critical thinking skills. Astington and
Olson (1995) asserted that it is hard to tell how students process thinking in their minds because
thinking has no behavioral standards, but rather you can deduce how students process thinking
by observing their actions as they are involved in different tasks. In the case of reading, reading